Menakar Inklusivitas Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Provinsi Jambi: Analisis Pro-Poor Growth 2023–2024
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35896/jse.v7i2.1230Keywords:
real poverty, economic growth, income redistribution, Shapley decomposition, pro-poor growth, Jambi ProvinceAbstract
This study aims to analyze changes in real poverty in Jambi Province between 2023 and 2024 using the Datt–Ravallion (1992) decomposition approach and Shapley decomposition through the DASP analysis package. The analysis was conducted separately for urban and rural areas to capture spatial differences in poverty dynamics. The data used came from the National Socioeconomic Survey (SUSENAS) with adjustments for inflation and the real poverty line, thereby reflecting actual changes in welfare rather than nominal changes.The results of the study show that the real poverty rate in urban areas of Jambi decreased from 10.19 percent in 2023 to 8.16 percent in 2024, while in rural areas it fell from 6.28 percent to 4.88 percent in the same period. However, Shapley decomposition shows that in both areas, the decline in poverty was due more to the effects of redistribution than to the effects of growth. In urban areas, the growth component (0.0031) actually slightly increased real poverty, while redistribution (–0.0234) contributed significantly to its decline. In rural areas, growth had only a small impact (0.0005), while redistribution (-0.0145) was the main factor in the decline in poverty. This shows that economic growth in Jambi Province is not yet fully inclusive (non-pro-poor growth), as the benefits of growth are still concentrated among the middle and upper classes, while improving income distribution is the key to reducing poverty. This study confirms that the effectiveness of poverty alleviation is determined not only by the rate of economic growth, but also by the quality and distribution of its results. The decomposition-based approach allows for more precise identification of the sources of poverty change and provides an empirical basis for the formulation of more inclusive and contextual development policies at the regional level.
References
Bourguignon, F. (2003). The growth elasticity of poverty reduction: Explaining heterogeneity across countries and time periods. In T. Eicher & S. Turnovsky (Eds.), Inequality and Growth: Theory and Policy Implications (pp. 3–26). MIT Press.
Datt, G., & Ravallion, M. (1992). Growth and redistribution components of changes in poverty measures: A decomposition with applications to Brazil and India in the 1980s. Journal of development economics, 38(2), 275-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(92)90001-P.
Duclos, J. Y., & Araar, A. (2006). Poverty and Equity: Measurement, Policy and Estimation with DAD. Springer US.
Fan, Z., & Zou, W. (2023). A three-component decomposition of the change in relative poverty: an application to China. Land, 12(1), 205. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12010205
Foster, J., Greer, J., & Thorbecke, E. (2010). The Foster–Greer–Thorbecke (FGT) poverty measures: Twenty-five years later. Journal of Economic Inequality, 8(4), 491–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-010-9136-1
Kakwani, N., & Pernia, E. M. (2000). What is pro-poor growth? Asian Development Review, 18(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0116110500000026
Kakwani, N., Son, H. H., Qureshi, S. K., & Arif, G. M. (2003). Pro-poor Growth: Concepts and Measurement with Country Case Studies [with Comments]. The Pakistan Development Review, 42(4), 417–444. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41260555
Luo, C. (2022). Economic growth, inequality, and poverty reduction in rural China: Evidence from 2007–2018. China Economic Journal, 15(2), 142–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12413
Mwabu, G. (2023). Poverty reduction through growth, redistribution and social inclusion in times of COVID-19: Kenyan evidence on the underlying mechanisms. Journal of African Economies, 32(Supplement_2), ii69-ii80. https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejac042
Nkoro, E. N. E., & Uko, A. K. U. A. K. (2025). Inclusive Growth: The Relationship Between Economic Growth And Poverty Reduction In Subsahara Africa. ADSU International Journal of Applied Economics, Finance and Management, 10(3).
Nugraha, P., & Widyasthika, H. F. (2017). When growth is inclusive in Indonesia? Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning, 1(3), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.36574/jpp.v1i3.19
Ravallion, M., & Datt, G. (1992). Growth and redistribution components of changes in poverty measures: A decomposition with applications to Brazil and India in the 1980s. Journal of Development Economics, 38(2), 275–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(92)90001-F
Sumarto, S. (2013). Poverty-Growth-Inequality Triangle: The Case of Indonesia. MPRA Paper 57135. Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/57135/
Syam, A. R. P. (2022). Application of the Poverty Equivalent Growth Rate (PEGR) Method (Case Study: Household Income Group in South Sulawesi 2016-2018). Eigen Mathematics Journal, 5(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.29303/emj.v5i1.125
Zhao, R., & Zhang, Q. (2023). Urban–rural poverty reduction in China: The role of inclusive growth and redistribution. Social Indicators Research, 167(3), 1025–1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-023-03112-8
