Penerapan Hukuman Mati Dalam Kasus Narkotika di Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35896/jse.v4i1.1186Keywords:
Death Penalty, Narcotics, Effectiveness, Law Enforcement, Human RightsAbstract
The circulation and abuse of narcotics in Indonesia has reached a
very alarming stage and has had a far-reaching impact on social
order, public health, and the future of the nation's future generations.
The government has responded to this phenomenon by imposing
strict sanctions, including the death penalty, against perpetrators of
narcotics crimes as a form of repression and deterrent. This study
aims to examine the legal regulations regarding the death penalty for
narcotics crimes in Indonesia and assess the effectiveness of its
implementation in eradicating narcotics crimes. The research method
used is normative juridical with a legislative approach and case
studies. The results show that the legal basis for the death penalty in
narcotics cases is stipulated in Law Number 35 of 2009 and the
Criminal Code, and is reinforced by the decisions of the Constitutional
Court. However, its implementation continues to reap pros and cons
from a human rights perspective. The effectiveness of the death
penalty in eradicating narcotics trafficking is considered suboptimal
due to the high number of violations, weak law enforcement, and
potential procedural violations. Therefore, an evaluation of the death
penalty policy is necessary to ensure it aligns with the principles of
justice, human rights protection, and the objectives of criminal law
itself.
References
Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika, Sinar Grafika, jakarta.
Soedjono, Narkotika dan Remaja, Alumni, 1983.
Teguh Prasetyo, Hukum Pidana Edisi Revisi, RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2014,
h. 119.
P.A.F Lamintang, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Citra Aditya Bakti,
Bandung, 1997.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, (Jakarta: Kencana, 2010).
Ali Achmad, Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) dan Teori Peradilan (Judicial
Prudence) Termasuk Intrepensi Undang-Undang, Kencana, Bandung, 2009
Bur Rasuanto, 2005, Keadilan Sosial: Pandangan Deontologis Rawls dan
Habermas, Dua Teori Filsafat Politik Modern I, Gramedia Pustaka Utama,
Jakarta.
Soerono Soekanto, Sri Mamuji, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, (Jakarta: UI Press,
2001).
Abdulkadir Muhammad, 2000, Hukum Perjanjian, PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung,
hal. 4
Subekti, 1998, Pokok-pokok Hukum Perdata, PT Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung hal.
17-20
Rasyid Ariman dan Fahmi Ragib, Hukum Pidana (Malang: Setara Press, 2016), hal.
57
Ibid.
Indonesia, Undang-undang tentang Hukum Acara Pidana, UU No. 8, LN No. 76,
Tahun 1981, TLN No.3209, Pasal 1 angka 2.
Rasyid Ariman dan Fahmi Ragib, Hukum Pidana (Malang: Setara Press, 2016),
hal. 57.
Ibid.
Indonesia, Undang-undang tentang Hukum Acara Pidana, UU No. 8, LN No. 76,
Tahun 1981, TLN No.3209, Pasal 1 angka 2.
https://jdih.kemenkeu.go.id/fullText/1999/42TAHUN1999UU.HTM
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Kencana Prenada Media Group,
Jakarta, 2005, hal. 237.
Ibid., hal. 181.
J Satrio, Hak Jaminan Kebendaan, Bandung, PT Aditya Citra Bakti, 2007, hal.
182
Purwahid Patrik dan Kashadi, Hukum Jaminan, Semarang, Fakultas Hukum
Undip, 2008, hal. 35
